<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BCI, a little psychodinamic question of user experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ibridazioni.com/2010/07/24/bci-a-little-hypothesis-of-psychodinamic-user-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ibridazioni.com/2010/07/24/bci-a-little-hypothesis-of-psychodinamic-user-experience/</link>
	<description>Highly Transdisciplinarity Thoughts for the Challenge of Complexity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Effetti cognitivi e psicodinamici dell&#8217;interfaccia cervello-computer &#124; The Connected Me</title>
		<link>http://ibridazioni.com/2010/07/24/bci-a-little-hypothesis-of-psychodinamic-user-experience/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Effetti cognitivi e psicodinamici dell&#8217;interfaccia cervello-computer &#124; The Connected Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibridazioni.com/2010/07/24/bci-a-little-hypothesis-of-psychodinamic-user-experience/#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>[...] un suo recente post Gianandrea Giacoma pone la questione delle implicazioni psicodinamiche e cognitive per [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] un suo recente post Gianandrea Giacoma pone la questione delle implicazioni psicodinamiche e cognitive per [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian</title>
		<link>http://ibridazioni.com/2010/07/24/bci-a-little-hypothesis-of-psychodinamic-user-experience/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibridazioni.com/2010/07/24/bci-a-little-hypothesis-of-psychodinamic-user-experience/#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>The poor kittens were in first days of life, so the inputs had a particular influence on their brains.
Yes, we&#039;ll need many researchs :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poor kittens were in first days of life, so the inputs had a particular influence on their brains.<br />
Yes, we&#8217;ll need many researchs <img src='http://ibridazioni.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davide 'Folletto' Casali</title>
		<link>http://ibridazioni.com/2010/07/24/bci-a-little-hypothesis-of-psychodinamic-user-experience/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide 'Folletto' Casali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibridazioni.com/2010/07/24/bci-a-little-hypothesis-of-psychodinamic-user-experience/#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>First, I find fascinating the fact that touch interfaces are somewhat better in creating &quot;direct manipulation&quot; of objects, while removing the affordance of the keyboard (that now is worse).

Second, I&#039;ve got a lot of doubts about those interfaces, but I&#039;d like to be able to test and develop on one before having a more defined idea about it. The removal of phisical actions I think it&#039;s a problem: I can&#039;t avoid myself remembering the experiment of the kittens I saw during my lessons of Cognitive Psychology at the University: when you put one kitten moving in a room and another on top of it unable to move, but inheriting the movement of the bottom cat, the top one will have impaired abilities.

It&#039;s probably not the same thing, but it&#039;s still interesting. Also, it might just be that the neural controls are the right tool for just some kind of actions. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I find fascinating the fact that touch interfaces are somewhat better in creating &#8220;direct manipulation&#8221; of objects, while removing the affordance of the keyboard (that now is worse).</p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;ve got a lot of doubts about those interfaces, but I&#8217;d like to be able to test and develop on one before having a more defined idea about it. The removal of phisical actions I think it&#8217;s a problem: I can&#8217;t avoid myself remembering the experiment of the kittens I saw during my lessons of Cognitive Psychology at the University: when you put one kitten moving in a room and another on top of it unable to move, but inheriting the movement of the bottom cat, the top one will have impaired abilities.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably not the same thing, but it&#8217;s still interesting. Also, it might just be that the neural controls are the right tool for just some kind of actions. <img src='http://ibridazioni.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

